Another consideration is file system. Once you get beyond basic hardware, there 
are a number of tweaks to look at on the software side.

Your setup isn't terrible, but there's a lot of room for improvement. As 
mentioned upstream, RAM would help. It wont be a cure all, but it's a start. WD 
Cav Greens are insanely slow. Black or Red are a big step in the right 
direction, but ideally I'd get that pool into a RAID 1 (again as mentioned by 
others.)

Last thing to consider; Just because the switch can move data at a gigabit per 
second doesn't mean that it's going to be getting a gig of data per second from 
the host, nor is the server going to be able to write a gig of data per second. 
BackupPC isn't always moving data, especially with Rsync. There's a great deal 
of time spent listing directory and partition contents, hashing to compare 
existing data to potentially new. The best speeds I've personally seen are in 
the 25-30 Mbps range.

Bottom line, I'd bet you're getting 4 or 6 mbps. There's some room for you to 
improve, but you're not going to see backups in the 50-60 Mbps range.

Gary Roach <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I am modifying my whole backup system for greater volume and speed. The
>
>new system is as follows:
>
>     Software - Backuppc using rsync (without SSH)
>     Server -    D865PERL Motherboard
>                     Pentium 4 - 2.4 GHz Processor
>                     IDE System hard drive
>                    SATA, 1 TB WD green backup data storage disk. (S/B 
>1.5 Gb/S)
>                     1GB system memory
>                     PCI bus
>                     Intel PWLA8391GT PRO/1000 GT PCI Network Adapter
>                     Cat 6 cable
>
>     Clients (2)
>Intel DP55KG   motherboard
>                 Intel i5-750 Processor 4 core, 2.66 GHz
>                 Hard Drive - Western Digital WD5000AADS -500GB, 32MB 
>Cache, SATAII (3 Gb/s)
>                 PCIX bus
>                 2 GB system memory
>                 Intel Gigabit CT PCI-E Network Adapter EXPI9301CTBLK
>                 Cat 6 Cable
>
>I have read all sorts of complaints about this type setup and need some
>
>advice. It would appear that I should get around 1 Gbit/S transfer rate
>
>for continuous data transfer. If this is not true, why not and what can
>
>I realistically expect.
>
>Gary R
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
>Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
>the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
>Employer Resources Portal
>http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>BackupPC-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
>Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

-- 
Phil Kennedy
Yankee Air Museum
Systems Admin
[email protected]

Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to