Il 13/05/2016 17:44, Juergen Harms ha scritto: > On 05/13/2016 03:04 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote: >> We*NEED* to move beyond v3.3.1/4.0.0pre, otherwise bitrot will disgregate >> this nice Project. > "Bitrot": I agree - the only question is whether in n or in n+5 years. > "It is a nice project": I dont agree - it is much more, it offers so > much more than any of the alternatives that are around, letting it decay > to rot should not happen. I fully agree. I was not implying "this is just a 'nice' Project". If we are still here after the "apparent death" (let's cal it "suspended animation", for the time being) brought forward by disappearance of the Chief Architect (i.e.: Craig) that's clear sign we still believe in BackupPC potentialities.
> Can this list organize itself to resume the minimum of activity that is > necessary to keep BackupPC alive? is the necessary competence on board? I do believe competence is on board; reason is many technical questions are actually answered on this very list, so someone knowledgeable enough is willing to devolve some of his free time to help the community. What seems to be missing is someone willing to take the helm and to do all the (often tedious) chores needed to maintain repository, documentation and website in working condition. Unfortunately this work is necessary, otherwise we won't be able to do releases (maintenance or otherwise) with any regularity. > Personally, I am willing to contribute, but lack many of the skills that > are needed (and given my age am only of very temporary use). What is a Ditto. I can program in perl, but I'm not a perl guru. I bet You're not very far ahead from me (I turned 60 a few months ago), but that's beyond the point. > minimum set of workitems to be picked up? repo management is clearly > only the first one Ok, I'll bite. IMHO we need (at least): 1. maintained web site 2. online documentation 3. online bugtracking / wishlist 4. source repository 5. steering committee (managing releases) 6. IRC channel (or equivalent) First tasks would be: 1. Maintenance (at least to collect patches already available) 2. Revamp installation to accommodate non-standard installs (I could work on this). 3. Possibly produce an official Docker release. 4. Produce a simplified interface for "normal operation" (for anyone not willig or capable to deal with the plethora of available options) 5. Possibly produce a completely canned rsync-for-win distribution (probably bases on PortableApps) 6. > I am not worried about my email and its unrelated subject - that topic > is trivial - I used it as an illustration and to be provocative. I was following suit. There are all too many people convinced BackupPC "does not need maintenance or further development" because "it is mature". Any patch sent to the list is virtually lost if not captured and included into the Code Base. > Juergen Mauro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
