On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 14:51 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM <backu...@kosowsky.org> wrote: > > Paul Leyland wrote at about 18:59:24 +0000 on Wednesday, February 3, 2021: > > > I have, very reluctantly, been forced to accept top-posting. > > > > Sadly, that has become too true. My solution is that a short answer is > > easier/simpler to top-post -- but any serious and in-depth dialog is > > much better off being woven into the earlier posting so that one can > > see context and not have to rewrite or reread. > > I'd guess that these days enough people use gmail's web interface that > collapses 'already read' content to ellipses that you can ignore or > expand that it doesn't really matter whether the new part is at the > top or bottom. But yes if you need to reply to different parts it > should be interwoven.
Ok, thanks all for your insights and comments. To summarize, it seems like my questions can be answered with "maybe", "sometimes" and "it depends". :-) I'll continue to end-post as before. :-) -- Kind regards, Sorin Srbu Find my OpenPGP public key here: https://cloud.srbu.se/index.php/s/KeEsCCDsG7PZG7N
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
