ACLs are not supported in 3.x but are supported in 4.x Not sure --fake-super is supported but --super is supported.
ralph strebbing wrote at about 10:35:24 -0500 on Thursday, March 3, 2022: > Hi All, > > I'm attempting to set-up BackupPC for use with our linux server > infrastructure, using either rsync or rsyncd. I'm currently running > the Ubuntu package of BackupPC (Version 3.3.2-3), with rsync_bpc > version 3.1.3.0 protocol version 31. > > So far things work great! However, I'm running into problems when > attempting to preserve ACLs. So in either the global config or the > host specific config, I add the following to the rsyncExtraArgs: > --acls > and I've also tried adding --fake-super along with the acls option, > and every time I run a backup with the acls arg, I get the following: > > rsyncd attempt: > full backup started for directory netfiles (baseline backup #2) > Connected to filesrv1:873, remote version 31 > Negotiated protocol version 28 > Connected to module netfiles > Sending args: --server --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group > -D --links --hard-links --times --recursive --acls --ignore-times . . > Read EOF: > Tried again: got 0 bytes > Done: 0 files, 0 bytes > Got fatal error during xfer (Unable to read 4 bytes) > Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) > Not saving this as a partial backup since it has fewer files than the > prior one (got 0 and 0 files versus 0) > > rsync attempt: > full backup started for directory netfiles (baseline backup #2) > Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -l root filesrv1 /usr/bin/rsync --server > --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group -D --links --hard-links > --times --recursive --acls --ignore-times . netfiles/ > Xfer PIDs are now 141899 > Rsync command pid is 141899 > Got remote protocol 31 > Negotiated protocol version 28 > Checksum seed is 1667312941 > Got checksumSeed 0x63612d2d > Read EOF: > Tried again: got 0 bytes > fileListReceive() failed > Done: 0 files, 0 bytes > Got fatal error during xfer (fileListReceive failed) > Backup aborted (fileListReceive failed) > Not saving this as a partial backup since it has fewer files than the > prior one (got 0 and 0 files versus 0) > > Is there something I'm missing? ACL functionality is critical for that > server as we rely on the POSIX ACLs. > > Thanks, > Ralph > > > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki > Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
