Hi all, i had time to make some tests. I run some local tests and figure out, that its not an problem with rsync 3.2.3. On local debian 11 systems, there was no problem with similar configuration. Because of noticing that the runtime with debian 11 seems to be longer than with debian 10, i tested a backup with smaler folder and less files, and it works.
But thats the problem. Instead of backing up the whole system at once, i tried an alias with a big folder of approx 230gb and 700.000 files, but this dosnt work. How can i improve that? Making smaller backupups isnt an option because administration rises to much. thx Am 10.07.2022 12:23:58, schrieb Taste-Of-IT: > Hi all, > > i have latest BackupPC running on Debian 10. I upgraded one system to Debian > 11. Backup before running well and without problems. After upgrading the > client it fails with these errors: > > Got fatal error during xfer (rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at > io.c(820) [generator=3.1.3beta1]) > Backup aborted (rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at io.c(820) > [generator=3.1.3beta1]) > > I searched and got different solution. One is the diffent speed of BPC and > the clilent, but thats not the case here. Another is the different versions > of rsync, which i use. But i didnt find a solution for that. > > Has anyone a solution for that? > > thx > > Taste > > > > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki > Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/ > _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
