On Wednesday 29 August 2007 13:41, Dirk H Bartley wrote:
> Woo Hoo
>
> It appears to be working.  No segfault, all data returned to bat from
> the director.

OK great. Thanks for testing. 

Now we just need to deal with the antiquated systems that don't have 
va_copy()   :-(

>
> Dirk
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 11:34 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello Dirk,
> >
> > Could you update to the latest SVN and test again?  I think there is a
> > good chance that I have fixed your problem.  It was one of the
> > possibilities on my list, but thanks to Martin's comment, I re-read the
> > stdarg documentation and now believe that it was due to re-calling a
> > subroutine, which trashed a critical argument pointer.
> >
> > Anyway, let's now hope it is fixed ...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kern
> >
> > On Tuesday 28 August 2007 22:48, Dirk H Bartley wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 07:53 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > Hello Dirk,
> > > >
> > > > I've looked over the code, and if there is something wrong with it, I
> > > > am certainly missing it.  Perhaps someone on the devel list will see
> > > > something that I cannot.
> > > >
> > > > At this point, I'm privileging a compiler bug.  Could you give me the
> > > > following information?
> > > >
> > > > 1. The version of the compiler and the architecture for each machine
> > > > where you have the failure.
> > >
> > > These are gentoo machines.  I'm getting the gcc version with:
> > > gcc-config -l
> > >
> > > myth2 ~ # uname -a
> > > Linux myth2 2.6.19-gentoo-r2 #5 SMP Thu Dec 28 22:24:13 EST 2006 x86_64
> > > AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
> > > gcc x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1
> > >
> > > srvalum3 ~ # uname -a
> > > Linux srvalum3 2.6.20-gentoo #3 SMP Sun Feb 18 12:32:04 EST 2007 x86_64
> > > Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2210 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
> > > gcc x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1
> > >
> > > > 2. The version of the compiler and the architecture for each machine
> > > > where you do not have the failure.
> > >
> > > workplay ~ # uname -a
> > > Linux workplay 2.6.17-gentoo-r5 #4 SMP Thu Apr 19 19:58:11 EDT 2007
> > > i686 AMD Sempron(tm)   2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
> > > gcc i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4
> > >
> > > > Could you give me the complete compile line with all the options for
> > > > both dird/ua_output.c and lib/bsnprintf.c?  Either edit the Makefile
> > > > and remove the $(NO_ECHO) in front of the compile rules (the .c.o:
> > > > and .cc.o: lines), or set the environment variable NO_ECHO to the
> > > > empty string.
> > >
> > > Compiling ua_output.c
> > > /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++   -c   -I/usr/include/python2.4 -I.
> > > -I..  -O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -g  ua_output.c
> > >
> > > Compiling bsnprintf.c
> > > /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++   -c   -I/usr/include/python2.4 -I.
> > > -I..  -O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -g  bsnprintf.c
> > >
> > > then set makefile optimization
> > >
> > > Compiling bsnprintf.c
> > > /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++   -c   -I/usr/include/python2.4 -I.
> > > -I..  -O0 -march=athlon64 -pipe -g  bsnprintf.c
> > >
> > > Compiling ua_output.c
> > > /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++   -c   -I/usr/include/python2.4 -I.
> > > -I..  -O0 -march=athlon64 -pipe -g  ua_output.c
> > >
> > > > Could you set the compile optimization for those two files to -O0
> > > > (minus oh zero)?  Either edit the Makefile or set it on the command
> > > > line via a preceding environment variable setting of CFLAGS.   Then
> > > > test again and see if it fails.
> > >
> > > Yes it fails.
> > >
> > > > As a separate test, if the above test still fails, could you comment
> > > > out the #define USE_BSNPRINTF 1
> > > > line in src/version.h and then rebuild everything?
> > >
> > > Yes it fails as well
> > >
> > > > Another interesting test would be to put:
> > > >
> > > >    Dmsg1(000, "fmt=%s\n", fmt);
> > > >
> > > > just after the line "again:" at line 737 in src/dird/ua_output.c  as
> > > > well as:
> > > >
> > > >    Dmsg0(000, "goto again\n");
> > > >
> > > > after "msg = realloc_pool_memory(msg, maxlen + maxlen/2);" at line
> > > > 741.  Then report what it prints when the seg fault occurs.
> > >
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:738 fmt=%s
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:738 fmt=%s
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:738 fmt=%s
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:738 fmt=%s
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:738 fmt=%s
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:743 goto again
> > > srvalum3-dir: ua_output.c:738 fmt=%s
> > > Kaboom! bacula-dir, srvalum3-dir got signal 11 - Segmentation
> > > violation. Attempting traceback.
> > > Kaboom! exepath=/usr/sbin/
> > > Calling: /usr/sbin/btraceback /usr/sbin/bacula-dir 16016
> > > Traceback complete, attempting cleanup ...
> > >
> > > And here is thread 2
> > >
> > > Thread 2 (Thread 1098918208 (LWP 16043)):
> > > #0  0x00002af703e5faef in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> > > #1  0x000000000046b9e3 in signal_handler (sig=11) at signal.c:167
> > > #2  <signal handler called>
> > > #3  0x00002af704a06c10 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > #4  0x00002af7049d8b70 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > #5  0x00002af7049f9a4a in vsnprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > #6  0x0000000000452bac in bvsnprintf (str=0x9 <Address 0x9 out of
> > > bounds>, size=<value optimized out>,
> > >     format=0x41801e01 "tn", ap=0x7) at bsys.c:292
> > > #7  0x0000000000431f6d in bmsg (ua=0x6e74a8, fmt=0x513af4 "%s",
> > > arg_ptr=0x41801ec0) at ua_output.c:740
> > > #8  0x0000000000432326 in UAContext::send_msg (this=0x9, fmt=0x513af4
> > > "% s") at ua_output.c:778
> > > #9  0x000000000042e43c in sql_handler (ctx=0x6e74a8, num_field=3,
> > > row=0x6e7738) at ua_dotcmds.c:480
> > > #10 0x00000000004508f2 in db_sql_query (mdb=0x6e7888, query=<value
> > > optimized out>, result_handler=0x42e350 <sql_handler>,
> > >     ctx=0x6e74a8) at postgresql.c:320
> > > #11 0x000000000042dd57 in sql_cmd (ua=0x6e74a8, cmd=<value optimized
> > > out>) at ua_dotcmds.c:496
> > > #12 0x000000000042da9b in do_a_dot_command (ua=0x6e74a8,
> > >     cmd=0x6f0f70 ".sql query=\"SELECT LogId, Time, LogText FROM Log
> > > WHERE JobId='2674'\"") at ua_dotcmds.c:131
> > > #13 0x000000000043e75f in handle_UA_client_request (arg=<value
> > > optimized out>) at ua_server.c:145
> > > #14 0x0000000000473c1d in workq_server (arg=<value optimized out>) at
> > > workq.c:357
> > > #15 0x00002af703e58135 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> > > #16 0x00002af704a5335e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > #17 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> > >
> > > On this machine, gcc had three versions
> > >
> > > srvalum3 bacula # gcc-config -l
> > >  [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.6
> > >  [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1 *
> > >  [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.2
> > >
> > > So as an experiment I set gcc to 4.1.2 and recompiled bacula with the
> > > same result.
> > >
> > >
> > > Dirk
> > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Kern
> > > >
> > > > PS: for the list, the problem is clearly (according to the traceback)
> > > > in Thread 2 between stack frame 4 and 5 where the argument "fmt" in
> > > > stack frame 5 should be identical to argument "format" in stack frame
> > > > 4, but has been shifted by 2 bytes!
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >-- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bacula-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bacula-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to