Hello, On Monday 10 September 2007 19:48, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just in the process building RPMs for Redhat-based distros and have a > question regarding a patch for 2.0.3 and its inclusion status in 2.2.
I suspect that I was not very specific. Patch 2.0.3-restore.patch should only be made to Bacula version 2.0.3 not to any version 2.2.x. > > I checked the ChangeLog and glanced through Bacula's source code (2.2.3) > for patches which are not mentioned in the ChangeLog but maybe I overlooked > something: > "Verify jobs tape/job selection timing bug" > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=803 > "Fixed in Version 2.0.4" > It looks to me as the patch attached in the bug was only applied partially. > Is this problem fixed in 2.2.3 nevertheless? There is a corresponding patch for version 2.2.2 that fixes bug #935, that was applied, so the 2.2.3 base code has the problem fixed as well as the other problems listed in the top of the ReleaseNotes file -- the information can also be found in the technotes-2.2 file (I forgot to update ChangeLog). Regards, Kern > > fs > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
