On 12 Sep 2007 at 16:12, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> Do the tests fail without the patch applied?
Yes. It's been random failures, perhaps one per regression test run.
I do a make distclean, I run the tests again, all is OK.
> If they only fail with the patch applied, I'd suggest you wait until the
> tests
> I suggest below are done.
They were just committed.
> I suggest regardless of whether or not the failures have something to do with
> your patch that you set up a script that does the following:
>
> - repeatedly runs a single test that is failing (such as incremental-2disk )
> enough times that you are sure it will fail (say 40 or 100 if necessary).
> - do "export REGRESS_DEBUG=1" in the beginning of the script to generate
> full output.
> - redirect the output of the script to a file
> - run the script and then check the output to ensure that it fails, and send
> me the output of the run that failed.
OK, I'll try that soon.
Right now, I'm testing this patch:
--- src/stored/stored.c (révision 5507)
+++ src/stored/stored.c (copie de travail)
@@ -600,10 +600,10 @@
if (debug_level > 10) {
print_memory_pool_stats();
}
- term_reservations_lock();
term_msg();
cleanup_crypto();
free_volume_list();
+ term_reservations_lock();
close_memory_pool();
sm_dump(false);
I was getting core dumps on FD and SD at random times. Eric
suggested the above patch.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Available for hire: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
