On Saturday 22 December 2007 17:06, Frank Sweetser wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Saturday 22 December 2007 15:37, Frank Sweetser wrote: > >> Kern Sibbald wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I would appreciate it if all the beta testers would test the current > >>> Branch-2.2. against the regression scripts. The two maxvol tests are > >>> expected to fail. > >> > >> Just to double check, should we be testing /branches/Branch-2.2/bacula > >> against /branches/Branch-2.2/regress or /trunk/regress ? And if the > >> former, it just needs a quick patch to configure and compile correctly > > > > That patch is already included in the 2.2 Branch so the regression > > scripts > > You may want to double check that that particular commit made it, as > sourceforge has a different opinion. > > http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/branches/Branch-2.2/regress >/scripts/regress-config?revision=5720&view=markup > > shows configure still being called with '--archivedir'.
The branch *should* now be updated to what is in the trunk -- I say *should* because I am far from being an SVN merge expert ... Thanks for pointing this out, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
