On Wednesday 26 March 2008 13:50:43 Peter Buschman wrote: > At 22:24 25.3.2008, Kern Sibbald wrote: > >We considered SQLite and rejected before starting the project because it > > is too big for what we need both in the size of the code and in its > >functionality. SQL is not needed. > > I wasn't suggesting SQLite be used as-is. Rather, I was thinking > out-loud and wondering if it contained a usable disk-based hashing > system within its codebase that might be liftable into Bacula. > > It sounds like Eric already researched and rejected that angle, however.
Actually, that is a possibility that I hadn't thought about - thanks. I will take a look at his code. I think he makes a clean separation between the SQL stuff and the disk indexing (binary tree if I remember right). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
