> There are probably a few other considerations as well. Though it could be
> possible, I am not sure this can be put into the next release. However,
> it
> is something that is becoming critical -- I saw one user report that he is
> backing up 10,000 server machines with Bacula -- can you imagine the
> problems
> of upgrading the File daemons on those machines!
>
> Comments would be appreciated.
>
Hello,
Is it really critical for bacula to handle that ?
If you manage hundreds of bacula client, I guess you already have some
central management.
And if you don't, wouldn't it be more productive to setup a neutral tool
that can also manage other pieces of software ?
I haven't personnally had the chance to go that far so I probably have
missed some points. This is just the way I'd try at first to get things
working.
Regards,
--
Mikael Kermorgant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
