Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Kern Sibbald schrieb am 04.10.08 um 15:13 Uhr:
>> That seems to me to be a very good name.
>>
>> Concerning the placement of the directive: I think it is worth examining if
>> we
>> can easily move it to the Exclude { } section. In that case, the directive
>> name could be
>>
>> Exclude {
>> Dirs Containing = .no_backup
>> ...
>> }
>
> I would like it! Do you think it would then be possible to put it
> into an Include{} section too to have the opposite effect?
> (Like I wrote ;))
+1
I think that is very clear and concise. I see little room for confusion
here.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
