On Sunday 22 November 2009 23:11:27 Phil Stracchino wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:23:36 Phil Stracchino wrote: > >> Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean, I personally believe this > >> would be a serious mistake, unless it is replaced with an alternate > >> mechanism for accomplishing the same ends. Without Pool and Storage > >> overrides, how will users keep separate sets of media for Full jobs (for > >> example)? > > > > There exists since quite a long time: > > > > Full Backup Pool > > Differential Backup Pool > > Incremental Backup Pool > > > > Job directives. > > My error; I'd somehow missed those additions. > > > Adding those to my configuration raises a question: > Why does a Job definition that specifies Full Backup Pool, Differential > Backup Pool, and Incremental Backup Pool *also* need to contain a > plain-vanilla Pool directive as well?
Because if you don't have them all, you need the Pool directive, and it does not seem worth the bother to add code to remove the requirement for a Pool directive in the particular case that all three are specified. Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
