Bruno Friedmann wrote: > Hello Eric, > > On 12/14/2009 10:37 AM, Eric Bollengier wrote: > >> Hello Bruno, >> >> You should find this information in the configure output (at the end), or >> > > This is what we can't have when we are using binary only installed files. > There's no like /proc/config.gz in bacula :-) > >
Yes, we are thinking about adding this information to the binary for easier support. >> you may find this information by using "strings" on the bacula-dir binary >> (or maybe the libbacsql file) >> >> strings bacula-dir | grep batch >> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE batch >> >> Bye >> >> > > ok I've try and only get this on the two proposed > > strings /usr/sbin/bacula-dir | grep batch > _Z27db_write_batch_file_recordsP3JCR > _Z23db_open_batch_connexionP3JCRP4B_DB > > Which leave me a bit perplex ! > Please, the the whole sentence, if you are using Bacula 3.0.x with libtool support, you need also to check the libbacsql object. (where the SQL code resides) > People around are certifing that it was a batch-insert enabled ... > > During a backup I didn't see mysql using a tmp file somewhere or using a tmp > table in processlist. > > Did batch-insert also work with MyIsam tables ? > Yes, but be aware that MyISAM and Innodb doesn't let you insert bulk data in parallel. This can be a performance problem in big setups. Bye > I think I should rebuild a real enabled batch-insert or did you have anoter > idea. > > > >> Bruno Friedmann wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I need to know if a bacula-dir binary has or not batch-insert-enabled. >>> Is there a simple (or complex) way to do this ? >>> >>> Thanks for tips. >>> >>> >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
