On Friday 19 March 2010 20:46:30 Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Vendredi 19 Mars 2010 20:41:40, Kern Sibbald a écrit :
> > On Friday 19 March 2010 20:31:34 Hugh Brown wrote:
> > > Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > On Friday 19 March 2010 19:19:29 Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > > By the way, Hugh: If you are 99.9% sure that the problem comes from
> > > > "alert" please don't submit a bug report.  If there is a race
> > > > condition, we definitely would like to see it.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I submitted a bug before I saw this.
> >
> > No problem, it was my oversight in the beginning ...
> >
> > > However, I'm able to
> > > duplicate the hang fairly regularly; it shouldn't take too long to see
> > > if the alert is the problem, and if it is the bug can be closed.
> >
> > If you are not convinced already 99.9% convinced it is the alert, which
> > seems to be the case, then it is worth us looking at the details of the
> > tracebacks
>
> I already looked the bactrace and the traceback file, and the thread who
> have all locks is waiting for the alert command (bfgets in bsys.c).

Thanks.

OK, I think the solution is for Hugh to:
1. Figure out why his alert command is broken
2. Create a script with a timer
3. Disable the alert

Kern

PS: I suppose that in some future version of Bacula, we could add a timer that 
triggers at 5 or 10 minutes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to