Ok that makes sense then. So with concurrence from Kern I will either issue a
patched 5.0.2 or probably better we release 5.0.3.
Ps sorry for replying at top but I am on Blackberry.
------Original Message------
From: Andreas Piesk
To: Scott Barninger
Cc: Josh Fisher
Cc: Bacula-Devel
Cc: Kern Sibbald
Subject: Re: [Bacula-devel] [bacula 0001571]: libraries permissions are
toorestrictive,breaksnotification by mail and running bat as unprivilegeduser
Sent: May 4, 2010 6:58 PM
D. Scott Barninger schrieb:
> Hmm I buy that except for one question. Why did it happen now and not in
> 5.0.1, 5.0.0 etc? We are still installing the same file with same
> permissions. And why the reference to 5.0.1 libs in the error message?
for the first part, look at these changes:
2010-02-01 Kern Sibbald Make configure.in changes recommended by Markus
Elfring
SBINPERM was changed from 0754 to 0750. unfortunately SBINPERM is used for libs
too.
for the second: as Martin Simmons pointed out, library versions are still at
5.0.1:
src/versions.h:
#define LIBBACCFG_LT_CURRENT 5
#define LIBBACCFG_LT_REVISION 0
#define LIBBACCFG_LT_AGE 1
src/lib/Makefile.in:
libbaccfg.la: Makefile $(LIBBACCFG_LOBJS)
@echo "Making $@ ..."
$(LIBTOOL_LINK) $(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEBUG) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
$(LIBBACCFG_LOBJS) -export-dynamic
-rpath $(libdir) -release
$(LIBBACCFG_LT_CURRENT).$(LIBBACCFG_LT_REVISION).$(LIBBACCFG_LT_AGE)
regards,
-ap
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
