On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:25:04 Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 05/16/10 09:22, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Saturday 15 May 2010 17:41:10 Phil Stracchino wrote: > >> After having messed around a bit with various configuration options in > >> 5.x to see what produces what results, I wish to propose that the > >> primary configure options in Bacula need to be revised. > > > > Phil, > > > > This seems like a nice project, but a rather large project since to do it > > right, one would need to not only modify a lot of Bacula's Makefiles, one > > would need to rewrite a lot of the document and rewrite a lot of the > > packaging scripts. In addition, it is relatively complicated, because it > > must work with shared libraries, non-shared libraries, and static linking > > as well. That is a lot of stuff to change and test. > > Yes, it would definitely be a non-trivial project (and one requiring > much more knowledge of autoconf than I have). I was quite taken back to > discover how much of the configuration currently does not yield the > expected results, and more so to discover that I could not build a fully > static client on Linux at all.
Well, you *can* build a static client. Just use the appropriate options. They are documented. I think the key is --disable-libtool if I am not mistaken. Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
