On Wednesday 21 July 2010 13:47:56 Dan Langille wrote: > On 7/21/2010 7:35 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:36:24 -0400, Dan Langille said: > >> > >> FYI, I'm not yet sure if this is something we should solve here via > >> config or if it's something I should fix in the FreeBSD port. > >> > >> I welcome opinions on it. > > > > Using --disable-libtool is the simplest solution -- no more pointless > > shared libraries. > > > > Other possible fixes are to put the shared libraries somewhere private > > rather than in /usr/local/lib (Bacula is the only thing that uses them) > > or to change the Bacula makefiles so that the important built-in options > > like -L../lib precede the configured options like -L/usr/local/lib. > > A patch we've been considering for FreeBSD looks something like this: > > +- $(LIBTOOL_LINK) $(CXX) $(WLDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -L../lib -L../cats > -L../findlib -o $@ $(SVROBJS) \ > ++ $(LIBTOOL_LINK) $(CXX) -L../lib -L../cats -L../findlib $(WLDFLAGS) > $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(SVROBJS) \ > + -lbacfind -lbacsql -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm > > Kind of hard to read there, but $(WLDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) are going to the > end of the line...
My question is are you explicitly setting LDFLAGS, and if so why? That, in my opinion is the source of errors -- Bacula should not need anything from /usr/local/lib. If it does, I would like to understand why. > > > __Martin > > > >> Short term, I will do something in the FreeBSD port. > >> > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 FreeBSD port fails to build during > >> upgrade > >> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:20:21 -0400 > >> From: Paul Mather<p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> > >> To: bacula-users<bacula-us...@lists.sourceforge.net> > >> > >> I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE (RELENG_8). Recently, the > >> sysutils/bacula-{client,server} ports were updated to 5.0.2. > >> Unfortunately, when updating via portmaster, the bacula-client port > >> updated successfully, but bacula-server did not. It fails to build: > >> > >> [[...]] > >> Compiling ua_restore.c > >> Compiling ua_run.c > >> Compiling ua_select.c > >> Compiling ua_server.c > >> Compiling ua_status.c > >> Compiling ua_tree.c > >> Compiling ua_update.c > >> Compiling vbackup.c > >> Compiling verify.c > >> Linking bacula-dir ... > >> /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.2/libtool --silent > >> --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/bin/c++ -L/usr/local/lib -L../lib -L../cats > >> -L../findlib -o bacula-dir dird.o admin.o authenticate.o autoprune.o > >> backup.o bsr.o catreq.o dir_plugins.o dird_conf.o expand.o fd_cmds.o > >> getmsg.o inc_conf.o job.o jobq.o migrate.o mountreq.o msgchan.o > >> next_vol.o newvol.o pythondir.o recycle.o restore.o run_conf.o > >> scheduler.o ua_acl.o ua_cmds.o ua_dotcmds.o ua_query.o ua_input.o > >> ua_label.o ua_output.o ua_prune.o ua_purge.o ua_restore.o ua_run.o > >> ua_select.o ua_server.o ua_status.o ua_tree.o ua_update.o vbackup.o > >> verify.o -lbacfind -lbacsql -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm > >> -L/usr/local/lib -lpq -lcrypt -lpthread -lintl -lwrap > >> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath > >> -Wl,/usr/local/lib -lssl -lcrypto > >> /usr/local/lib/libbacsql.so: undefined reference to > >> `rwl_writelock(s_rwlock_tag*)' > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.2/src/dird. > >> > >> > >> ====== Error in > >> /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.2/src/dird ====== > >> > >> > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.2. > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server. > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server. > >> > >> > >> It looks to me that the linking step above is wrong: it is picking up > >> the old version of the library installed in /usr/local/lib by > >> sysutils/bacula-server 5.0.0_1. It shouldn't be including > >> "-L/usr/local/lib" in the invocation of libtool. > >> > >> Anyone who builds the port from scratch will not have a problem, but > >> anyone updating via portmaster or portupgrade will run into the problems > >> above. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Paul. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel