> I have the following strange effect, which I think that it is not correct, but > I did not understand the acquiring code for a new volume enough to find why > this happens. > > Here is what I can reproduce: > > My configuration has two servers with a LTO3 Drive each. > > When I make a backup in server A and a restore of this backup on server B > I have the problem that I get this error Message: > > Fatal error: No Volume names found for restore. > > I found the following workaround: > > I simply make a small backup on server B on the tape that was written on > server A and now is mounted on server B. > This works like it should, and afterwards I can do my restore without > problems. > > Is there an explanation for this behaviour, or is this a bug and I should do > some deeper debugging? > > P.S.: All deamons are Bacula Version 5.0.3 on x86_64, SUSE, with postgresql > > thanks and best regards, >
You need to better explain the problem. Are both servers directors? If so do they share a single database? John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
