Hello,

2012/7/27 Bastian Friedrich <bastian.friedr...@collax.com>

>
> the attached patch modifies Bacula's behavior during restore of data that
> originates from a block device with the "sparse" option set. Instead of
> simply
> seeking to the requested file position, zero bytes are written to the
> file/device in chunks of 64k.
>
>
Well, what about a thin-provisioned volumes/disks?

The main problem is that someone was used a sparse=yes option with
raw-device (lvm) which do not support thin-provisioning (something like
sparse file on fs).

If a user will have a thin-provisioned volume that he can successfully use
sparse=yes option without any garbage and can use it even with a vm image.
A lot of enterprise users use this functionality in their
storage environments. We shouldn't change this behavior without a deep
discussion about pros. and cons. of it.

All we should do is to explicitly add a correct information (even a
warning) to the documentation. No change in code, please.

-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to