Hello, Yes, in my previous answer, I should have specified that I was referring to sqlite3. Sqlite 2 is not supported any more by the author as far as I know.
For a large number of files per server (> 1 million) Sqlite3 is very slow compared to a properly tuned PostgreSQL. Regards, Kern On 11/12/2012 06:19 AM, James Harper wrote: >> The same person mentioned that, according to a 2011 bug tracker entry, >> SQLite is no longer supported. Can someone confirm? >> >> I ask because the documents seem to indicate it is still supported. I have >> asked the poster for a reference to this claim. >> > I thought support for sqlite was dropped quite a while back but sqlite3 was > still supported... bacula 3.0.x had --with-sqlite and --with-sqlite3 options > while 5.0.x appears to only have --with-sqlite3 > > Any reference to sqlite3 being no longer supported should clearly state it is > version 3 as sqlite and sqlite3 are somewhat different. > > That said, is anyone really using sqlite3 for anything in production beyond a > single server with a small number of files? > > James > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-devel mailing list > Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
