Hi,

i'm not using unmodified MySQL configuration. My Bacula database has about 21 
GB and i'm mainly having problems with inserting into File table after the 
virtual full backup of our e-mail server. Job has more then 7 000 000 of files 
and insert takes about 5 hours. Just to explain why i'm searching how to speed 
up things without HW upgrades.

azur




______________________________________________________________
>Hello,
>
>Thanks for your question.  I have asked my database expert who
>says the same as I do but more in detail.  I will include his response
>below.
>
>Bottom line: we have spent a long time determining the best indexes
>for Bacula, which are the ones we release in the code, so we do not
>recommend making any changes.  That said, we have not tested removing
>the "extra" index for several years and it may be that database engines
>have evolved.  The problem with changing the Bacula default index setup
>is that it may perform well in the beginning, but seemingly simple
>changes can have big surprises in little used queries that are
>seldom used, but by removing or changing
>an index you can make a difference of a factor of 1000, which means that
>an unusual query that runs rather quickly can become a real bottleneck.
>
>So change indexes at your own risk.
>
>Probably you are using an untunned MySQL with the default conf (my.cnf)
>file rather than one of the examples for larger databases.
>By proper tunning you can significantly improve the performance.
>If you have a big database say bigger
>than 1 or 2 GB, our experience is that you will get *much* better 
>performance
>with PostgreSQL, providing you tune the conf parameters correctly (out 
>of the
>box, the Postgres conf is a real bummer).
>
>Best regards,
>Kern
>
>=== email from someone who knows SQL better than I do ====
>
>The single index on JobId is compact, the other is very large, I guess the
>scanning time is not exactly the same (i.e. the single index on JobId can
>be much faster)
>
>Yes, Postgresql can use composed index and may not require it, but for
>MySQL, I have some doubt if it can be used all the time (maybe recent
>versions). It is hard to read their execution plan to be sure how
>they use it.
>
>This user could do some tests, it's rather simple to drop
>the index and run a large restore on a big database (probably not
>interesting if the File table contains less than 300,000,000 records).
>
>If we have a bit of time one day, it might be good to test this
>modification on large and "recent" databases.
>
>Anyway, if this user is using MySQL AND has performance problems
>during insert, he probably didn't modify the default my.cnf.
>
>===================== end included email ==============================
>
>
>
>On 08/16/2013 01:30 PM, azurIt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm having some MySQL performance difficulties so i started to search what 
>> can i do better. My table 'File' had these indexes created:
>> CREATE INDEX file_jobid_idx on File (JobId);
>> CREATE INDEX file_jpf_idx on File (JobId, PathId, FilenameId);
>>
>> Which looks correct according to documentation:
>> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Catalog_Maintenance.html
>>
>> BUT! The first index apperas to be unneeded as it's part of the second 
>> index. According to MySQL documentation, 'any leftmost prefix of the index 
>> can be used by the optimizer to find row':
>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/multiple-column-indexes.html
>>
>> I suggest to remove it.
>>
>> The same applies also for PostgreSQL:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/indexes-multicolumn.html
>>
>> azur
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
>> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
>> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
>> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-devel mailing list
>> Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
>>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to