Hello Phil, Error on my side. I did not remove all the remnants of Python. I should have it completed shortly.
Best regards, Kern On 03/31/2014 08:15 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 03/31/14 13:58, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> On 03/31/14 12:51, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> Oh, I forgot, it is even easier. Just edit src/console/conio.c and >>> tweak the #defines. I couldn't make it detect and adjust automatically >>> for Solaris 10 and Solaris 11, but there is a comment telling you what >>> to do. >> OK, I'll give that a shot. >> >> I think I've traced the libbacpy problem to a 32-bit vs. 64-bit >> libopenssl problem. > The conio.c tweak does resolve the console build failure. The > libbacpy.so issue is proving to be a more difficult problem. I think > the root cause is that libbacpy.so requires libssl.so, but my installed > openssl is 32-bit, and can't be used to create a 64-bit libbacpy.so for > a 64-bit Bacula build, and I'm having trouble getting a 64-bit openssl > compiled. I may have to settle for a 32-bit storage daemon. > > Interestingly, if I configure bacula using --without-python, the > config.status happily reports "Python support: no", but then the build > still tries to create and link against libbacpy. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
