On 15.04.2015 19:44, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 04/15/15 12:28, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> On 15.04.2015 15:23, Raymond Burns Jr. wrote: >>> 2. This is where I have questions. >>> Assuming the FSFE was the legal protection during the Barios lawsuit, >>> the final outcome was not 100% pleasant for the Bacula team. That is >>> an assumption. >> The assumption is not correct. Though FSFE was the legal protection of >> the community version during the Bareos lawsuit, the lawsuit was between >> Bacula Systems and Bareos and did not directly involve the FSFE copyright. >> >> Bacula Systems (and the Bacula community team) is happy with the >> outcome. I assume that Bareos is as well. > > If one might ask, what *was* the outcome?
The outcome is that we went to court, and the judge asked us to negotiate an agreement. We did not get very far, so the judge sent us back for a second try, where we did reach an agreement. Part of the agreement was that it would remain confidential. Bacula Systems is happy with the agreement, but sorry that is all I can say. Best regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
