Went to retest the writeset limit, and found I can't unless I want to
clear another set of tapes, because bacula-9.0.8 is still overriding job
parameters I enter manually with what the schedule says.

I went to run a manual full backup of this machine, which backs up about
528.000 files.  The console said:

run job="Babylon5 Backup" fileset="Gentoo Full Set" level="Full"
client="babylon5" pool="Full-Disk" storage="asgard-file" priority="10"
when="2018-08-08 11:45:19" yes
Job queued. JobId=19966

Which is what I entered.  But when I look at running jobs, Bacula has
changed the Storage to babylon5-sd and the Pool to Full-Tape.


I am going to opine once again that Bacula should NEVER silently
override job parameters entered by the administrator via the console.
It's the administrator's *job* to know what resources are valid for a
job, and most of the time the administrator is going to be right.  If
Bacula thinks I have entered wrong or invalid parameters, AT MOST it
should notify me that it thinks they're wrong and ask if I want them
changed.  It should NEVER change them without asking me first or telling
me that it changed them.

I can't run a test backup to an ephemeral file that I can just throw
away when I'm done, without first either creating a new Job or changing
the controlling Schedule, not because I don't have the resources or
because the destination is invalid, but because Bacula thinks it knows
better than I do and I didn't actually intend to do that.


This behavior really needs to be fixed.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  ph...@caerllewys.net
  p...@co.ordinate.org
  Landline: +1.603.293.8485
  Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to