>>>>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:34:07 +0200, Radosław Korzeniewski said: > > Hello Martin, > > 2018-08-14 12:56 GMT+02:00 Martin Simmons <mar...@lispworks.com>: > > > Sorry to say that it doesn't compile on FreeBSD (see below). > > > > The warnings about BSOCK::recv are probably generic and occur in every > > file. > > > > A standard Linux compile does not raise any warnings here.
The warning will depend on the C compiler. I'm using the default FreeBSD clang-based C compiler and passing -Wall. It looks like gcc (gcc7 at least) does not issue this warning unless you explicitly pass -Woverloaded-virtual. > > > > There is some hack for ENODATA in bsockcore.c, but not in bsock.c. > > > > Yes, it should be in bsock.c too. > > Could you check the following patch: > > diff --git a/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c b/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c > index a6e4d98c3..c6bed981d 100644 > --- a/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c > +++ b/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c > @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ > > #define BSOCK_DEBUG_LVL 900 > > +#if !defined(ENODATA) /* not defined on BSD systems */ > +#define ENODATA EPIPE > +#endif > + > /* Commands sent to Director */ > static char hello[] = "Hello %s calling\n"; Yes, thanks, that fixes the compilation. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
