Hello Carsten,Thank you for the information, and your work in keeping the
licenses clean. It is much appreciated.Over the next few days I carefully go
through all your points and fix them and the in about a week I should be able
to release 9.6.3 ...Best regards,KernSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: Carsten Leonhardt <l...@debian.org>
Date: 3/3/20 23:10 (GMT+01:00) To: bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc:
Kern Sibbald <k...@sibbald.com> Subject: Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula Release
9.6.2 + Status Report Hi Kern,thanks for the new release!While looking through
the changes since v9.4 I noticed a few issues:These files say they have
non-free
licenses:bacula/src/plugins/fd/docker/baculatar/Dockerfileregress/scripts/regress-utils.shThese
files have "Copyright (C) (...) Bacula Systems SA" and don'tmention the BSD
2-Clause license like the other files
there:bacula/platforms/rpms/suse/bacula-aligned.spec.inbacula/platforms/rpms/redhat/bacula-cloud.spec.inbacula/platforms/rpms/redhat/bacula-aligned.spec.inThe
file "bacula/scripts/manual_prune.pl" contradicts itself: the headersays (c)
Kern Sibbald and BSD 2-Clause, but the included man page says(c) Bacula Systems
SA and "only for personal use".The new makefiles don't specify "$(CFLAGS)" in
the target for.c.lo. Debian's QA tools are unhappy about that, I attached a
patch.Some spelling errors, found by Debian QA tools, I attached
anotherpatch.Especially fixing the license issues would help us preparing
Bacula 9.6for Debian.Best regards,Carsten
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
