Hello Elias,

Yes, I believe you can.  First you must build Bacula so that the libraries and such are built, then you
must explicitly go to the plugin directory that contains the Docker plugin code and build it there.

I believe it is:
cd <bacula>/src/plugins/fd/docker
make

I am not sure though ...  It is possible that the docker source code was never committed.  If this is
the case, please email Eric (on-list) I am sure he will add it -- at least in version 11.0.0 coming soon.

Best regards,
Kern


On 12/11/20 5:10 PM, Elias Pereira wrote:
Hello Kern,

Sorry for the direct mail. In my bacula clients (all debian), I'm installing via community repo.

I like to know if I could compile only the docker plugin by myself?

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:14 PM Kern Sibbald <k...@sibbald.com> wrote:
Hello Sven,

The individual .sig files are all available in the download area
directly.  The bacula-sig tar file is for convenience, and is the only one
that is listed in the WordPress download area.  We have been doing it
that way for years.  Perhaps you misunderstood my email -- I have
replaced all the .sig files with the correct version.

In fact what was previously released was perfectly fine, it was just
signed with an older signature key (DSA I think).  Since 2018 we have
used a new RSA key for signing.

Bottom line is that I did just replace the existing bacula-*.tar.gz
(and  .bz2) files with new signature files as you have now requested.

I think this already satisfies your request.  If not, please let me know.

Thanks for confirming that the tar'ed .gz signature files are correct. :-)

Best regards,
Kern

On 12/11/20 10:49 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 11.12.20 10:17, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> If you find any additional problems, please let me know.
>
> One nitpick is that the signatures are bundled into the
> bacula-sigs-9.6.7.tar.gz, but at least the Debian system for
> downloading and verifying upstream releases cannot use this (to my
> knowledge), as it expects the signature file to be available as
> tarbal-name.sig
>
> If you could just replace the already existing bacula-*.tar.gz.sig
> files, this would help us tremendously.
>
> Other that that, by manually extracting the correct signature file, I
> can confirm it now verifies correctly with the pubkey from the website.
>
> Grüße,
> Sven.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-devel mailing list
> Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel



_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel


--
Elias Pereira

_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to