>>>>> On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 11:30:21 -0500, Dan Langille said: > > Some time ago, the FreeBSD ports of bacula9, bacula11, and bacula13 were all > marked as broken on aarch64 and riscv64 because of missing sbrk > > Will the upcoming Bacula 15 release have the same issue?
Yes, I think so. > If so, let's fix it > in the code, so we don't have to patch it down stream? I'm sure it affects > more than FreeBSD. There is no standard way to get the memory usage, so it has to be OS specific. > references: > > * https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/bacula9-client/ - 01 Jan 2021 23:51:49 > > Now we a code review which should allow the build to succeed on hosts without > sbrk. I hope this can help our code. > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42979 The patch in the review looks good to me for FreeBSD as long as "report no heap usage" is OK. __Martin _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
