On 5/9/24 11:47, Marcin Haba wrote:
Hello Phil,
For the slow Bacula restore, BAT the same as Baculum and Bacularis uses
Bacula Bvfs interface for doing restore. The Bvfs restore part
responsible for preserving hardlinks causes this slowness. Some time ago
I researched it a bit. The result together with a workaround you can
find in this thread:
https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/message/58758531/
<https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/message/58758531/>
Traditional restore using the bconsole 'restore' command interface does
not cause this problem (it does not use Bvfs).
Huh. Now I'm curious to benchmark that and see how different the
performance is.
This ought to be an ideal case because there are no hardlinks involved,
so both should restore EXACTLY the same set of files.
--
Phil Stracchino
Fenian House Publishing
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landline: +1.603.293.8485
Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
