Hi,

When I start bacula-dir 5.2.5 with the -t switch, I get a series of messages 
about orphaned buffers.

bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 7 bytes at 21a8e88 from 
parse_conf.c:416
bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 10 bytes at 21bff18 from 
inc_conf.c:598
bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 10 bytes at 21c0908 from 
inc_conf.c:598
bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 10 bytes at 21c1458 from 
inc_conf.c:598
bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 10 bytes at 21c1dc8 from 
inc_conf.c:598
bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 10 bytes at 21c2738 from 
inc_conf.c:598
bacula-dir: smartall.c:404 Orphaned buffer: bacula-dir 10 bytes at 21c2ef8 from 
inc_conf.c:598

Without -t, it starts clean.
Is(or was) this something that only rears its head when you are verifying the 
configuration, or is it something I should pay more attention to?

Google came up with this:

The "Orphaned buffer" message suggests that some field of an item in the
config is being initialized more than once.

I don't have any double (repeated) entries in my configuration that I know of, 
but there might be (not sure) some settings in jobdefs or schedules that are 
being overridden in individual job definitions, or something like that.  Is 
that a bad idea?

Thanks for any reactions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to