On Thursday 25 August 2005 23:38, Neil Schneider wrote:
> Kern Sibbald said:
> > Although BSD and other licenses are free for commercial users, I
> > wouldn't say
> > that is the case for GPL. For a commercial software company as
> > opposed to a
> > service company, GPL is somewhat of a nightmare. It is true they
> > don't have
> > to pay for it, but it comes at a heavy price -- all your software that
> > "touches" or "uses" GPL software must be GPL or otherwise Open
> > Software as
> > well.
>
> Would you either restate this, or explain what you mean, because on
> the face, this is patently false.
You have just made a flat statement without any detail, and I am a bit tired
of this subject, so I am not going to respond until I see some reasonable
argument that indicated my error. You have also cut out content leading to
this statement that is important to understand it.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
