Well, it seems like the new 1.38.0 informational message is serving the intended purpose, but at the same time, creating a bit of confusion, which is understandable.
I've added some additional documentation on this in the manual that can be useful. Please see: http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION000147000000000000000 Then scroll down to the heading "onefs=yes|no" On Thursday 10 November 2005 14:02, David Komanek wrote: > Hi all, > > yes I have another problem, plese, forgive me :-) > > I just added new client - my workstation. I am using bacula-1.38.0. I > today first full backup I got following warnings: > > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /misc > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /net > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into > /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /selinux > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /sys > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /dev > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into > /root_alternate_1 > ts5-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into > /root_alternate_2 > > > My "df" says: > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/md0 287660528 132227100 140585360 49% / > /dev/shm 517136 0 517136 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sda2 11048788 63712 10414772 1% /root_alternate_1 > /dev/sdb2 11048788 5223604 5254880 50% /root_alternate_2 > > > Since my configuration does not allow to cross filesystem boundaries, I > would expect this only if the /net /sys /dev etc. entries were links to > other filesystems which they are aparently not: > > drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 5080 Oct 26 13:14 dev > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Oct 26 13:13 misc > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Oct 26 13:13 net > drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Oct 26 15:13 selinux > drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 0 Oct 26 15:13 sys > > drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Oct 26 13:13 rpc_pipefs > > On the other hand, /root_alternate_1 and /root_alternate_2 are > mountpoints so I would expect, the should be no warning since they are > not on my include list. > > Bacula is running as root in my configuration. > > Should I add the above directories to inlude list of backed-up > filesystems ? Since this is Fedora Core 4 with selinux enabled, this > could be specific problem not known from other systems. > > Thanks for help, > > David Komanek > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very > own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel -- Best regards, Kern ("> /\ V_V ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
