This is maybe more readable : I have a pool with two full tapes :
Tape_1|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=5/11/2005 Tape_2|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=23/11/2005 And a Scratch Pool with Tape_3. If I run a job, this is what happen : Tape_1|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=5/11/2005 Tape_2|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=23/11/2005 Tape_3|Append|1 year|1Recycle=yes|LastWritten=23/11/2005 I was expecting : Tape_1|Purged|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=5/11/2005 Tape_2|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=23/11/2005 So Bacula don't really need Tape_3 as it can use Tape_1. Ludovic. >>- The retention of the volume added from the Scratch Pool should be the >>retention of its new pool instead of one year. >> >> > >Yes, this is a good idea. The Volume should take on the retention period of >the new pool. Noted ... > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
