> So, in conclusion <grin> I guess what I'm saying is, that so long as > nothing you do would break an existing installation then by all > means, take the choice which requires the least amount of > effort on your part and still makes some sense as > far as version numbers are concerned. > > And, thanks for all that you do. Bacula is great! > I vote for this option. Minimum-effort working solution.
If there were any chances to get binary rpms, that would be veeery nice! -- Regards, Timo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
