On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:17:17PM +0000, hikari wrote:
>       Annoyingly you can't use a 127.0.0.0/8 IP on it though, you have to
> assign some other IP to it.  Microsoft never seem to do anything the
> logical way.  Why they couldn't just have installed the loopback
> device by default and assigned 127.0.0.0/8 to it I don't know.

Based on what I understand, this is because instead of requiring a true
loopback device for normal operations, 127/8 is treated special and piggybacks
over any/all existing interfaces.

For a neat trick sometime, try sending a packet with a destination ethernet
address of a Windows box and a destination IP address in the 127 range.  In
quite a few configurations, the Windows box will actualy process the packet!

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Network Engineer          |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
    GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to