On Sunday 09 April 2006 00:11, Joshua Kugler wrote:
> Well, it appears I've taken care of the problem. After going down to one
> processor, and still having problems, I recompiled with -O0 and I'm through
> lots of jobs (even concurrent jobs) with no problems. I'll re-enable the
> other processor on Monday and let it run, but it appears I have a working
> install at the moment.
Interesting solution. We have seen the problem of optimization on 64 bit
machines, but never in the places where you were seeing it.
For future reference, could you remind me of the following things:
- Which version of Bacula worked with -O2:
- Which version of Bacula did not work with -O2:
- What distribution are you using:
- What version of g++ are you using:
- What is your machine architecture (i.e. 32 or 64 bits):
Thanks.
>
> Thanks again for all your help and pointers. They are appreciated
> immensely.
>
> j----- k-----
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
