Kern Sibbald writes:
1. You want *all* data to be encrypted ...
2. You want to control the encryption key(s) on a single machine (SD encryption)...
When the encryption on the SD is done, does that mean all the processing time will be spent on the SD side? couldn't that in theory create a burden on the SD machine?
So far, in the little time I have used Bacula, I like very much how friendly it is on resources. Compared to a few other methods I have tried recently (rsync, tar, unison).. I find Bacula is very friendly on resources yet faster than the other methods.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
