I'll try CentOS 4.3. It's the closest you can get to RHEL4 without paying. I'll run my Oracle 10g test environment on it, and Bacula as well.
Georger --- "George R.Kasica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > >In short FC5 is a *BAD* release, and if you are on > FC4 and considering moving > >up to FC5, I would recommend reading over my list > of woes before making any > >decision. > > > >Concerning the FC5 rpms. Scott is not yet running > an FC5 system (good choice > >Scott), so I am going to make the FC5 rpms, but > given the general lack of > >stability, I am not sure when or how I am going to > do it. > > > >I'd sure like to get back to programming, and > starting to wonder if it is > >possible to upgrade from FC5 to FC4 ... > > Kern: > > Thanks for the warning. I have the FC5 CDs here and > was going to try > an upgrade on my FC4 box this coming > weekend....guess I'll put that > off for a bit and install 1.38.10 instead on FC4 :) > > Thanks seriously for the update! > > ===[George R. Kasica]=== +1 262 677 0766 > President +1 206 374 6482 FAX > Netwrx Consulting Inc. Jackson, WI USA > http://www.netwrx1.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ICQ #12862186 __________________________________________________ Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
