On 2006-07-25 18:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Help! Bacula is unable to use one of the two drives in our LTO2 (Dell
> Powervault 132) autochanger.
>
>
>
> I've been fine-tuning my bacula config, and went from having all backups
> going
> to a default pool to separate pools for incrementals, full, and archive
> backups.
>
> Previously, backups worked fine with the autochanger, writing to both tape
> drives at once.
>
> I haven't made any changes to the "Storage" resource in the bacula-dir.conf,
> or
> to the bacula-sd.conf at all. Only the Job definitions, Pools, and Schedules
> were changed in the bacula-dir file.
>
> I do not believe that this is a configuration issue, just that bacula is
> confused about whether it's got control over Drive-1, and that bacula needs
> to
> have it's idea of the status of that device reset.
>
> Backups are working, but only to a single drive. The "status storage" command
> produces the following:
>
>
> -------------------
> Device status:
> Autochanger "pv132t" with devices:
> "Drive-0" (/dev/tape0)
> "Drive-1" (/dev/tape1)
> Device "Drive-0" (/dev/tape0) is mounted with Volume="000062"
> Pool="Incremental"
> Slot 3 is loaded in drive 0.
> Total Bytes=433,027,038,315 Blocks=6,712,350 Bytes/block=64,511
> Positioned at File=433 Block=851
> Device "Drive-1" (/dev/tape1) is not open or does not exist.
> Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted.
> Drive 1 is not loaded.
> -------------------
>
>
> I've tried loading a new tape into drive 1 (via mtx, outside of bacula), but
> any attempt to get bacula to recognize the tape (update slots, mount,
> umount) seems to hang at "Contacting storage director".
>
> Currently, there are 8 backups running, writing (slowly!) to the same drive.
>
> Environment:
> bacula-sd, bacula-dir 1.38.9 on the same server (Linux 2.4.26)
> bacula-fd 1.38.9 on various servers
>
>
> [1] Is there any way to force bacula to recoginize the 2nd drive without
> interrupting the current backups?
>
> [2] Will restarting bacula-sd interrupt the current backups (will they be
> resumed at the same point)?
>
> I'd appreciate any answers as quickly as possible, as there is about 4TB of
> data being written very slowly, one tape at a time...when it could be using
> both devices.
>
>
> (By the way, I tried searching the archives on sourceforge before posting, but
> that returns the message "Permission Denied. Searching of non-projects is not
> allowed.")
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> ----
> Mark Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> System Administrator
> Section of Biomedical Image Analysis 215-662-7310
> Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania
>
> http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?search=mark.bergman%40.uphs.upenn.edu
>
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
> delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
> have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail,
> and delete the original message.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
./bconsole
mount
1
will mount the tape loaded in /dev/tape1 , but I guess you will get the same
problem as I have, where bacula select Drive-0 but will use the tape mounted in
Drive-1 , and the result will be that bacula unload drive-0 and send load x 0 to
the exchanger, that can't load the tape since it's loaded already.
This part must be rewritten I think :-(
It was working fine for me when I had a pool for each drive, but when I changed
to only one storage device (the autochanger) , I can't bind a drive to a pool
any more, nor limit the jobs/tape.
If you set "Prefer Mounted Volumes = no" on each Job{} , it will work good
enough, but it can still happen that bacula will mount a tape that is loaded in
an other drive.
/birre
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
