On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > I'm not convinced the indexes are the same. Some people say yes, some say no, > and it seems to be also dependent on whether one is talking about MySQL as > you are or PostgreSQL. The best solution is to test for your particular > case. >
Hi Kern et al., the new index sadly has done nothing to speed up the pruning process, so for now the only solution seems to be using the "purge oldest volume" directive in our pool definition in order to get the recycling to work reliably. Please don't obsolete that statement any time soon, ok? ;-) All the best & thanks for your help, Uwe -- Uwe Schuerkamp, NIONEX GmbH (http://www.nionex.com/) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +49 (0)5241 / 80 10 66 FAX: / 806 23 38 Avenwedder Str. 55, D-33311 Guetersloh, Germany GnuPG KeyID: 5887047D, Fingerprint: 2E1320229A3F63 7F676FE9B1A836A461 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
