On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:23 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote: > Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the > better solution.
OK. It looks that almost everybody agrees on lto-2. Now the remaining question is whether is Quantum LTO-2 HH better (I know it is quite cheaper - around 500€) choice than HP's Ultrium 448? Or, what is (if) justification of HP's much higher (in comparison) price ? > dlt components may have cheaper list prices, but cheaper is not always > less expensive or a better value. I agree - that's why I dumped eg. DAT 72. > I would compare the situation to a fast two-seat sports car and a > school bus. If I have 10 kids and a nominal income, the bus is the > better value. Or, let's squeeze them in a van :-) Sincerely, Gour
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
