Hi Kern, Kern Sibbald writes:
> 1. They are not relative to the current CVS. Hm, they are applying to it, or? At least I tried that.. > 2. They are a significant change from the current code, which is not a > problem > during the development cycle, but *is* a major problem at this point. This I understand and I agree fully here. when 1.40 is at the end of the release cycle this change is too sweeping to include. But maybe for a later release it is ok. For so long it can be kept as local patches... > 3. They seem to change non-FreeBSD code -- perhaps not the functionality but > by adding a switch(). If that is a problem, it can also be done by using if() but I found switch() more suitable here. > On the other hand, I would suggest that you work with Jeremy Reed as his > patch > once it is appropriately tweaked is something that I could see adding to 1.40 > because: > 1. It is relative to the CVS > 2. It makes the mininum necessary changes > 3. For the most part the changes seem to be FreeBSD specific patch-src-findlib-create_file.c is based on his patch. I just added the restore of the file flags on failure, and error messages in case of failures. What is the problem with it and the CVS version? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
