Hi, what have i to expect in the uname-column of the client-table? the devel-docs describe it as "uname -a (yet unused)". (unused by bacula, but maybe used by a user)
uname -a on my workstation: "Linux hostname 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Dec 20 14:51:19 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux" uname's from my 1.38.11 clients: Windows 2000,MVS,NT 5.0.2195 Windows Server 2003,MVS,NT 5.2.3790 i386-pc-solaris2.10,solaris,5.10 i686-pc-linux-gnu,redhat,8.0 i486-pc-linux-gnu,debian,testing/unstable i686-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,Enterprise 3.0 sparc-sun-solaris2.10,solaris,5.10 "fd-arch,os-name,os-version" ? uname's from my 2.0.0 clients: 2.0.0 (04Jan07) i486-pc-linux-gnu,debian,4.0 2.0.0 (04Jan07) sparc-sun-solaris2.8,solaris,5.8 2.0.0 (04Jan07) Linux,Cross-compile,Win32 => win2003 server 2.0.0 (04Jan07) Linux,Cross-compile,Win32 => win2k server "fd-version,xxxxx,xxxx" ??? none of them looks like `uname -a`, why is the win32-os-version lost? maybe i want to do something with my clients depending on the os-version and platform or clients version .... (its nice to see the fd-version in the table, but on win32 i miss the os-version. and i'm sure what to expect in the next bacula-release) Regards Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
