Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> 1. You might want to use two different databases, one for regular backups and 
> one for archives.  This will clearly separate your archive data from your 
> regular data.

Basically this working now. But I'm a bit confused about the handling
of pools and the assigned volumes with a second catalog.

These are the pools/volumes I created before I added a second catalog.

*list pools
+--------+--------------+---------+---------+----------+-------------+
| poolid | name         | numvols | maxvols | pooltype | labelformat |
+--------+--------------+---------+---------+----------+-------------+
|      2 | CleaningPool |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      3 | Archiv       |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      4 | Full         |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      5 | Differential |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      6 | Incremental  |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      7 | Scratch      |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
+--------+--------------+---------+---------+----------+-------------+

Pool: Archiv
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+
| mediaid | volumename | volstatus | enabled |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+ ...snip...
|      17 | 06D143L3   | Append    |       1 |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+


Now with the second catalog I see the same pools if I switch to the new catalog
ArchiveCatalog in bconsole with 'use'.

*use
The defined Catalog resources are:
     1: MyCatalog
     2: ArchiveCatalog
Select Catalog resource (1-2): 2
Using Catalog "ArchiveCatalog"
Using Catalog name=ArchiveCatalog DB=bacula_archive

*list pools
+--------+--------------+---------+---------+----------+-------------+
| poolid | name         | numvols | maxvols | pooltype | labelformat |
+--------+--------------+---------+---------+----------+-------------+
|      1 | Default      |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      2 | CleaningPool |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      3 | Archiv       |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      4 | Full         |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      5 | Differential |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      6 | Incremental  |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
|      7 | Scratch      |       0 |       0 | Backup   | *           |
+--------+--------------+---------+---------+----------+-------------+

That's fine, but the pools are all empty.

*list volumes
Pool: Default
No results to list.
Pool: CleaningPool
No results to list.
Pool: Full
No results to list.
Pool: Differential
No results to list.
Pool: Incremental
No results to list.
Pool: Scratch
No results to list.
Pool: Archiv
No results to list.

Therefor the archive job was complaining that there is no volume in the Archiv 
pool.

21-Feb 09:55 VU0EM005: Job VU0EM003_Archiv.2007-02-21_09.53.40 waiting. Cannot
find any appendable volumes.

Please use the "label"  command to create a new Volume for:
    Storage:      "LTO3" (/dev/nst0)
    Media type:   LTO3
    Pool:         Archiv


To solve this, I deleted the Archiv pool in MyCatalog, relabled the tape and
added it to the Archiv pool of the ArchiveCatalog. In addition I deleted the
Full, Default, Differential, Incremental pools in ArchiveCatalog.

It is a bit confusing that the pools exist in both catalogs, but not the
volumes. What about the scratch pool, is there a way to share the volumes
between the catalogs/pools?

Ralf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to