Hi, On 4/13/2007 12:14 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: > On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:46, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> On Monday 02 April 2007 22:28, Arno Lehmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 4/2/2007 6:37 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>>> On Monday 02 April 2007 18:00, Xeos Laenor wrote: >>>>> I've noticed a no strange behavior when i start a new job. >>>>> Bacula verify if there is a Full backup in catalog when the job is > add >> to >>>>> the queue but not when the job really start. >>>>> It could be a problem if i have already an identical (full) backup in >>>>> progress. In this case, when i add the new job in the queue, it doesn't >>>>> detect the actually full backup and do another full backup for this job >> (ok >>>>> two equals jobs in queue, it's not often :p). I would prefer have a >>>>> differential backup for the second job. >>>>> >>>>> So, maybe, you could move the test at the moment where the job really >>>>> starts, no? >>>> This is a Feature Request item. See the web site for info about doing >> Feature >>>> Requests. >>> Hm... wasn't this discussed some time ago? >> Yes, but I don't recall if we have a project or not. We have so many > projects >> that maybe I forgot ... >> >>> In any case, I agree with Franck - it would be good to move the upgrade >>> to a later time, if that's possible. I just had to work around that >>> problem myself :-) >> Almost everything is possible -- it just takes programmers. >> >> >>> Looking through the projects, I don't find this one. >> OK, that confirms my feeling on this. >> >>> Looking through the list mail is too much work now :-) >> It isn't necessary. If it isn't in the projects list, it needs a new email >> and some discussion on the list. >> >>> (Although technically this might be a feature request because the >>> current behaviour is what has been working for a long while, and there >>> is no documentation indicatng things should be different, the current >>> behaviour is really very close to a bug, IMO.) >>> >>> Arno > > Hello. > > I just ran into the same problem. One client does its 20 GB backup over > internet and it takes a few days. Today I noticed Bacula had just completed > the 2nd full backup and is now waiting for appendable volumes to do the 3rd > one. > > On the 9th of april, 21:47 the 1st full backup was completed, the 2nd job's > log: > ===== > 07-Apr 23:05 backup-dir: No prior Full backup Job record found. > 07-Apr 23:05 backup-dir: No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. > Doing FULL backup. > 09-Apr 21:47 backup-dir: Start Backup JobId 5770, > Job=serv1-userdata.2007-04-07_23.05.16 > 09-Apr 21:47 backup-dir: Recycled volume "serv1-userdata-full-0002" > ... > ===== > > I just cancelled the 3rd job, set "rerun failed levels = no" for that job and > hope that tonight the incremental job is done. > > It seems a bug to me also - job should have decided its level on 9th of april > upon starting, not on the 7th upon queuing (when there was the 1st full > backup still running). > > Arno, how did you work around such a situation?
Sorry for the short answer, I'm in a hurry... try to avoid it by careful planning. Otherwise, manually. Arno > Silver -- IT-Service Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
