On 5/28/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > and thanks for changing the subject line :-) > > On 5/28/2007 10:54 AM, Rich wrote: > > On 2007.05.25. 23:13, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > ... > >>> as for the method, what about using a wiki page for feature requests ? > >>> that way permanent links to versions could be used for voting results, > >>> but head could be used to add new ones, fix typos and so on. > >> Yeah... well... difficult question. > >> > >> If you know a wiki system where you can do votes the way we always did > >> them (or have good arguments for changing the voting process), I'm very > >> open for suggestions :-) > > > > i was unable to subscribe to sourceforge lists for some time, but if i > > understand correctly, voting is done by sending a mail to voting > > address, right ? > > Yes, that's how we did it. > > > i would guess then a script calculates all the votes, and the result is > > put up on the webpage. > > Not exactly... somone (up until the last time, Kern counted) counts the > votes, and the results are then manually posted to the web page. > > As voting takes lace only about nce a yaer, that was reasonable. > > > > making the result go in wiki (which would allow for easy updating), then > > refer to particular revision for voting, and just put up results in > > either a separate, or the same wiki page - that probably would not > > change current voting process much. > > Well, as you see, it would :-) > > > > all other suggested possibilities indeed seem to be a bit of an overkill > > to me (unless any of them gets implemented for other reasons, like > > bugzilla or something). > > ... > > To clarify things a bit: > > Currently, I only plan to manage the feature requests and the voting > process. > > For that purpose, I'm looking for a solution to collect and present > feature requests, preferrably in the format they are in now (i.e. > Description, detailed notes, status and people working on it). The > voting functionality should be included, so that, for each voting > period, any (registered) user can vote for a number of features, can > assign weights to the votes, and the solution adds the votes up correctly. > > I'm not too eager to install a complete CMS plus add-ons, or bugzilla, > or something similarly oversized. As of now, I don't see an out-of-the > box solution, and I think that creating a tailored voting solution would > not be unrealistic, but I'm still open for suggestions.
Is RT too ambitious for you? Works very nicely for Perl... Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
