-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Josh Fisher wrote:
> Support wrote:
>> Dear Shon
>>
>> I have a similar situation and solved it byusing this stargegy.
>>
>> Firstly the disk volumes should be treated as "Tape" drives in that only
>> onle volume can be opened at a time but you can have many concurrent jobs
>> writing to that volume - my setting is for a maximum of 5 concurrent jobs/
>>
> The problem with concurrent jobs writing to the same volume is that job 
> data is interleaved on the volume. For tape, the interleaving will make 
> restores painfully slow. Even for disk storage it will slow things down. 
> I prefer to have one job at a time write to a volume so that the jobs 
> are placed sequentially in the volume. This would require multiple 
> drives for tape, but for disk it just requires multiple device 
> resources, each writing to a separate volume.  The volumes "loaded" in 
> those devices are regular files and can be in the same partition or even 
> the same directory.

Spooling also solves this problem. Concurrent jobs are then written to
tape in a sane manner. This helps with shoeshining on a tape drive too,
as data is fed as fast as it can be written.

>> I write data to a LaCie 1 TB disc using Firewire and get throughput of
>> about 60 GB / hr.
>>
>> If you have several customers and can group them then one option is to
>> partition your disc so that each group uses a different partition and this
>> can be seen as a different "tape" drive and the jobs should write to each
>> partition concurrently.
>>   
> 
> They can be grouped by directories in the same partition. Partitioning 
> will not likely make use of the full storage capacity of the drive 
> because one partition will fill up first, leaving wasted space on the 
> others. Grouping by directory and using a single partition on the drive 
> allows the full capacity of the drive to be used.
> 
>> As for full backups I use job migration - ie the jobs are written to disc
>> and then migrated to tape.
>>
>> If you need my config files I will email them to you.
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen Carr
>>
>> Shon Stephens wrote:
>>   
>>> I'm trying to understand job concurrency in Bacula and what strategy I
>>> should use for backing up clients.
>>>
>>> Its likely that I will have to backup around 50 clients. My strategy is to
>>> write incrementals to disk volumes and fulls to tapes. I assume its
>>> possible
>>> for Bacula to write to multiple disk volumes simultaneously if configured
>>> to
>>> do so, but what about tapes? I have my tapes divided by customer so that
>>>
>>> Customer1 Pool - 8 volumes, 2 in slots each week
>>> Customer2 Pool - 8 volumes, 2 in slots each week
>>>
>>> Can Bacula write a job from 2 different clients(file daemons) in Customer1
>>> Pool at the same time? How does this work? I understand that Bacula can't
>>> write a job from Customer1 Pool and Customer2 Pool at the same time
>>> because
>>> these are different volumes.
>>>
>>> Also can bacula simultaneously spool to disk and write to tape for the
>>> same
>>> job?
>>>
>>> I'm looking for good advice on how to streamline Bacula so that I'm not
>>> always running backups or have to many jobs waiting on resources in use.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shon
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>>> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>>> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>>> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>
>>> http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________
>>> Bacula-users mailing list
>>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-users mailing list
>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>>   
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

- --
 ---- _  _ _  _ ___  _  _  _
 |Y#| |  | |\/| |  \ |\ |  | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer II
 |$&| |__| |  | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
 \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGrjfvmb+gadEcsb4RAmmqAJ9DFjCnz2CEh7mad8hunqTmODdqRQCdExxl
hShxk5ju9L3FXL6qqumnOP0=
=USbX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to