pichi wrote:
> So to summarize:
> 
>  - if you have the sql file, you don't need the bsr
> 
>  - if you have the sql file, but it's buried somewhere in your backup
> volumes,
> the bsr is the best way to get at it quickly
> 
>  - if you don't have the sql file, you can fake it with bscan
> 
> 
> Frank,
> 
> Wow! That nails it for me. I understand now what pieces are for what, and
> when I need them. Thank you so much for that explanation.
> 
> But if I am to do a bscan re-build as you sudgest will I have to reformat
> again? I guess that would be the best way to really test it.

The easiest way to test out bscan would be to just truncate all of the tables
in the catalog (after making a suitable dump, of course).  A full reformat is
not necessary.

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
    GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to