-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we did our test:
>
> - first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
> to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
> jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger) failed as usual with
> missing files and error messages that some restored files have larger
> size (that are not log files or changing files).
>
> - we installed on a spare server the version 2.2.3, clients didn't
> changed (2.1.28). Run the same backup jobs. Restored and this time
> everything was OK. Just one test, but it is promising that finally
> this issue is gone. I'll watch the discussion and if 2.2.3 is decided
> as stable we will upgrade the production clients and then we will
> start as before daily restore tests for at least two weeks, so we will
> have more proof (if we do :) that the problem is solved.
One point that I'm not sure was mentioned before: 2.1.28 was not a
production release. I assume you are just doing testing, or have gone to
that release because of problems with 2.0.x... but just checking.
> Monday, September 10, 2007, 5:49:58 AM:
>
> DL> On 10 Sep 2007 at 4:55, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> Monday, September 10, 2007, 4:38:57 AM:
>>>
>>>>> - if the bug is fixed we could start using concurrent jobs now;
>>> DL> I would expect you to test the patch yourself to verify it works for
>>> DL> you.
>>>
>>> Sure. There is an unanswered question that I needed to confirm before
>>> the tests from my original message that started this discussion:
>>>
>>> "is it OK to have dir and sd 2.2.3 and 2.1.28 for
>>> the clients to successfully test the bug fix"
>
> DL> Yes, that will be OK. I'm sure, looking at the patch.
>
>>> If yes we will need to setup just one new server for the test and not
>>> to redo all of the current (server and clients) that seem to be
>>> working well.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
- --
---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer II
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG5f2gmb+gadEcsb4RAq8QAJ9i9H8G9xJd5Km1Fs+h2S1muSRTKQCgwwTb
RUmgWu8bEZZ9dvC3vNAuy3Q=
=Mcsq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
begin:vcard
fn:Ryan Novosielski
n:Novosielski;Ryan
org:UMDNJ;IST/AST
adr;dom:MSB C630;;185 South Orange Avenue;Newark;NJ;07103
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Systems Programmer III
tel;work:(973) 972-0922
tel;fax:(973) 972-7412
tel;pager:(866) 20-UMDNJ
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
